Admisibilitatea contestației în anulare întemeiată pe art. 503 alin. (2) pct. 3 C. pr. civ., în cazul în care instanța de recurs nu a analizat o critică de nelegalitate a hotărârii de fond întemeiată pe art. 488 alin. (1) pct. 8 C. pr. civ.
04 01 2022
04 01 2022
In this article, we propose to review case law and doctrine dealing with the issue of the admissibility of the appeal for annulment based on the thesis regulated by art. 503, para. (2) pt. 3) Civil procedural code, in cases where the court of review omitted to render a judgement on a thesis of illegality regarding the judgment pronounced by the first court on the merits of the case, thesis of illegality invoked in support of the appeal based ...
Citește mai mult
Imprevizibilitatea, inadecvarea şi insuficienţa legislaţiei de urbanism şi implicaţiile lor – Pe marginea deciziei Curţii Constituţionale a României nr. 49/2020 privind (ne)constituţionalitatea prevederilor Legii nr. 350/2001 –
04 01 2020
04 01 2020
By Decision no. 49 of February 4th, 2020, of the Constitutional Court of Romania, finding the unconstitutionality of the dispositions of art. 32 par. 1 of Law no. 350/2001 regarding landscaping and urbanism [contrary to art. 1 par. 5 of the Constitution] and by the related considerations, a crucial moment has been marked in the existence of Romanian urban planning law. In a general appreciation, regarding both and on the first hand the contes...
Citește mai mult
Follow
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer