The study analyzes the notions of separate opinion and concurring opinion and how the current legislation regulates them. The author proposes, de lege ferenda, the express recognition of the opinions that the judge adds to the decision in order to dissociate himself/herself from certain inappropriate expressions to which the majority resorted.

The article analyzes the concepts of separate opinion and concurring opinion as an expression of the constitutional and legal principle of the independence of judges, the difference between them, their legislative enshrinement and their importance for the decisions of the Constitutional Court. According to the author, the separate and concurring opinions have a constitutional legitimacy and, therefore, they cannot be censored by the ma...

The study analyzes the notions of separate opinion and concurring opinion and how the current legislation regulates them. The author proposes, de lege ferenda, the express recognition of the opinions that the judge adds to the decision in order to dissociate himself/herself from certain inappropriate expressions to which the majority resorted.